https://kenanupa.com/bm3bVu0.P/3/pwvobtmGVoJEZODP0f2OM_TFkwz/NiT/YVyYL/TLYkxTOKTgMS1KNujuMo
top of page
Blue Sand White Beach Simple Watercolor Etsy Shop Banner.jpg

U. Dhar vs State of Jharkhand || Case Summary || Criminal misappropriation


money

[Criminal misappropriation]

Facts

Tata Constructions & project Ltd. was given a task of construction, which was delegated to Singh Construction Co. According to the complaint, after the completion of the task, the complainant demanded back the balance amount under the contract from TCPL on the failure of which the complaint was filed.

Issues

Whether criminal misappropriation has taken place.

Judgement

Supreme Court laid that the word 'dishonestly' & 'misappropriated' are necessary ingredients for the offence. Any dispute of recovery of money is civil and criminal action is purely not needed. The recovery is of civil nature and no offence is commited hence they were found not guilty.

 
 
 

Comments


Blue & White Marketing Agency Advertisement Poster.jpg

Ask us for a case summary

or ask us something

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
bottom of page