Rudal Sah vs.State of Bihar case summary
Facts:
Rudal Sah, an inmate, was held in custody for additional years after his sentence ended because of delays in procedures and the absence of required legal steps for his release. Even though he finished serving his sentence, he was still held in custody without reason.
Legal issues:
The main question was whether keeping Rudal Sah in custody after his sentence was a breach of his basic rights according to the Constitution.
Legal Act:
The situation was based on Article 21 of the Indian Constitution regarding the right to life and personal liberty, as well as provisions related to prisoners' rights and the importance of timely justice.
Argument:
- Provide a written application for consideration. The Supreme Court examined the circumstances regarding Sah's prolonged detention and determined that the state did not follow the required legal steps for releasing a prisoner. The court stressed that the right to freedom is a basic right, and any unfounded confinement goes against this belief. The State was deemed at fault for failing to ensure Sah's timely release, which constituted a violation of the constitution.
Judgment :
The Supreme Court decided in favor of Rudal Sah, instructing the State of Bihar to release him promptly and grant him compensation for his wrongful imprisonment. This situation emphasized the importance of the State in maintaining legal principles and safeguarding the rights of individuals from random actions.
-Anushka Shekhawat
Manipal University, Jaipur
Comments