top of page
Blue Sand White Beach Simple Watercolor Etsy Shop Banner.jpg

Mary Roy vs State of Kerala (1986) || Case Summary || AIR 1986 SC 1011

Updated: Jan 26

Mary Roy v. State of Kerala (1986)

AIR 1986 SC 1011

Case Summary

Social Activist Mary Roy.

Facts

Mary Roy, a Syrian Christian woman from Kerala, challenged the provisions of the Syrian Christian law of inheritance which gave her brothers a larger share of her father’s property than she was entitled to. Under the personal law governing the Syrian Christian community, women were entitled to a smaller share of their father’s property compared to male heirs. Mary Roy, who was the daughter of a well-to-do family, argued that this provision was discriminatory and violated the constitutional guarantee of equality under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution.Mary Roy’s petition was based on the fact that the Kerala Christian Succession Act, which governed the inheritance rights of Syrian Christians, was outdated and unfairly discriminated against women. The law treated women as inferior to men in terms of property rights, a situation that Mary Roy believed was in violation of the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. She sought equal rights to inheritance under the law and urged the Supreme Court to rule that the unequal treatment of women in inheritance matters was unconstitutional.


Issues

1.     Whether the provisions of the Kerala Christian Succession Act, which allowed unequal inheritance rights for women, were unconstitutional.

2.     Whether the law discriminated against women in violation of their fundamental rights to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.


Relevant Articles

  • Article 14: Equality before the law.

  • Article 15: Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.

  • Article 21: Protection of life and personal liberty.


Judgment

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mary Roy, striking down the provisions of the Kerala Christian Succession Act that gave unequal inheritance rights to daughters. The Court declared that the Act violated the constitutional principles of equality and justice, as guaranteed by Article 14. The Court held that women, irrespective of their religious background, were entitled to the same rights as men regarding inheritance. The ruling ensured that women in the Syrian Christian community would receive equal shares of their father’s property, aligning the law with the constitutional mandate for gender equality.


-Harinya


Commentaires


White Purple Abstract Modern Call For Papers Academic Poster.png
Blue & White Marketing Agency Advertisement Poster.jpg

Ask us for a case summary

or ask us something

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
bottom of page