https://kenanupa.com/bm3bVu0.P/3/pwvobtmGVoJEZODP0f2OM_TFkwz/NiT/YVyYL/TLYkxTOKTgMS1KNujuMo
top of page
Blue Sand White Beach Simple Watercolor Etsy Shop Banner.jpg

KS Puttaswamy vs Union of India || AIR 2018 SC (SUPP) 1841 || Case Summary

KS Puttaswamy vs Union of India

AIR 2018 SC (SUPP) 1841

Case Summary

[Fundamental Rights]

[Right to Privacy]


Aadhaar Card

Facts

In 2012, retired Justice K.S. Puttaswamy filed a writ petition challenging the constitutionality of the Aadhaar scheme, which mandated citizens to provide personal biometric data. The petition contended that the scheme infringed upon individuals' fundamental right to privacy, raising significant questions about privacy as a fundamental right and its status under the Indian Constitution.


Issues

  1. Is the right to privacy recognized as a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution?

  2. If recognized, what is the extent of this right, and how does it interact with other fundamental rights?


Legal Provisions

  • Article 21: Right to life and personal liberty.

  • Article 19: Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.


Judgment 

A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution, rooted in Article 21 and other provisions. The Court highlighted that privacy is intrinsic to human dignity and autonomy and can only be restricted by fair, just, and reasonable laws. This landmark judgment overturned previous rulings, such as MP Sharma and Kharak Singh, which had not recognized privacy as a fundamental right. It established a foundation for future privacy protections, influencing subsequent cases, including those challenging the Aadhaar Act.



Rishita Vanjani

Comments


Blue & White Marketing Agency Advertisement Poster.jpg

Ask us for a case summary

or ask us something

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
bottom of page