Hall vs Brooklands case summary
Facts:
Hall, the plaintiff in the case of Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club, sustained injuries in a motor car racing event arranged by Brooklands Auto Racing Club. One of the cars ran wildly into the enclosure during the event and hit Hall. Hall sustained grave injuries and contended that the club had been negligent in regard to ensuring reasonable precautions for the safety of the spectators.
Legal issues:
The only issue of law was one of whether the Brooklands Auto Racing Club was liable for the injuries sustained by Hall, specifically whether they had breached their duty of care to the spectators by not providing sufficient safety measures.
Legal Act:
This case was primarily judged based on the principles of negligence and duty of care under common law. It was held by the court whether the club took sufficient measures to ensure safety to the public, and that its actions came within the threshold as laid down under the Occupiers' Liability Act and volenti non fit injuria.
Evaluation:
The court decided in favor of Brooklands Auto Racing Club and found Brooklands not negligent. The judgment held that the risks associated with attending motor races were inherent in the event and spectators assumed some sort of risk as spectators. The court concluded the club had taken sufficient care and hence a company couldn't be held liable for the 'freak' accident which lead to the plaintiff injuries. This decision really cemented that there is some level of hazard individuals accept when participating in certain activities; therefore, event organizers are somewhat released from responsibility.
Comments